Hi,
I've sent revised High North PWG Last Call comments. I found a few more
dangling "normative" occurrences.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Jan-April: 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
May-Dec: PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> Bill,
>> > On May 19, 2017, at 3:41 PM, wamwagner at comcast.net wrote:
> >
> > Fine. I defer to Ira on this, although I thought that Ira had already
> send a No Comments response. I do wonder if this position reflects on
> the PWG 3D Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities v1.0 (PJT3D)
> document.
>> Since PJT3D is a direct mapping from IPP to the XML schema, the only
> conformancy thing to write is a declarative statement to this effect, which
> we already do in section 1:
>> This document defines an XML schema representing the semantic elements
> and values of the IPP 3D model ...
>> JDFMAP's mapping is "fuzzy" in places, and there are often multiple ways
> of expressing the same intent in JDF, so there is makes more sense to use
> SHOULD when appropriate.
>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
>>