PWG> Updated PWG Process comment

PWG> Updated PWG Process comment

Wagner,William WWagner at
Wed Apr 14 18:12:24 EDT 2004

me too
Bill Wagner

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Farrell, Lee [mailto:Lee.Farrell at] 
	Sent: Wed 4/14/2004 2:06 PM 
	To: thrasher at; pwg at 
	Subject: RE: PWG> Updated PWG Process comment

	Good idea -- it works for me.  
	-----Original Message-----
	From: owner-pwg at [mailto:owner-pwg at] On Behalf Of
	thrasher at
	Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:11 AM
	To: pwg at
	Subject: Re: PWG> Updated PWG Process comment
	I have a suggestion for modifying the "Maturity Level" (section 4.5.1)
	of the current process document.
	As I have been starting to update the older approved PWG documents I
	noticed that the Maturity Level is currently not supposed to be included
	on a Candidate Standard or Standard.....although on some of the recently
	approved documents it is.....
	I'm looking for a way to indicate that PWG 5100.4-2001 is obsolete
	(other than a background watermark...).
	when I update the links and front matter.
	Change the "Maturity Level" to "Status"...and add "Approved" and
	or "Obsoleted by...." as kewords to be used on Candidate Standards and
	So the "Status" of a Working Draft or other PWG documents  would be
	Initial, Interim, Prototype, and Stable.
	The "Status" of a Candidate Standard/Standard/other approvable documents
	would be Approved, or Obsolete....
	Here's a copy of this applied to the update of well
	as the updated cover matter."

More information about the Pwg mailing list