Good idea, Tom. This should be a standard addition to any
public spec the PWG produces.
...jay
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- JK Martin | Email: jkm at underscore.com --
-- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
-- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
-- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Hastings wrote:
>> Both the IPP Model document and the JMP Job Monitoring MIB document
> list the email DL and how to join, using ipp-request at pwg.org and
>jmp-request at pwg.org.>> I'd like to see a sentence added as to why an implementor might
> want to join the DL.
>> Implementors will find things that need clarification.
>> Also both standards have registration processes for adding
> additional attributes and values.
>> I've talked with Ron Bergman about this for the Job Monitoring MIB
> and he thought it was a good idea.
>> How about adding the following sentence right after the mention
> of the ipp-request at pwg.org and jmp-request at pwg.org in the Author's
> addresses section:
>> Implementors of this specification are encouraged to join this e-mail
> distribution list in order to partipate in any discussions of
> clarification issues and review of registration proposals for
> additional attributes and values.
>> Comments?
>> Thanks,
> Tom