Don,
Thanks for your support of my proposal and inclusion of a "PWG General"
slot in the Wednesday meeting.
Although you did not specifically state, I am assuming that a 50 minute
slot will be available to discuss Job Monitoring MIB traps.
Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.
On Wed, 7 Jan 1998 don at lexmark.com wrote:
>> Ron, Randy, et al:
>> I basically agree with everyone's opinion that we should spend some time at
> each meeting with an update on the various projects and investiage and
> discuss potential new work projects. I have felt that we have had our
> plate full with the projects we have and that e-mail can generally provide
> a distribution means for status. Additionally, it is difficult to pick a
> time that allow everyone to participate in the discussion since many only
> attend 1 or 2 days of the 5 day meeting.
>> If there is strong belief that with the winding down of the the PRINTER
> MIB, the JOB MIB and IPP (to some degree) we need to spend some time
> talking about status and future direction then I would propose doing that
> on Wednesday mornings. This would allow those that attend on 1394 printing
> meetings to stay
> over night if they wish to particate and would be easy for most other
> people to attend as well. Since IPP now has "blossumed" to two full days,
> I don't believe taking a couple of hours on Wednesday morning in Maui for a
> PWG discussion would impact IPP's progress. Afterwards we can discuss
> whether this was time well spent.
>> As such, all project chairmen should prepare a short report on status
> including high level open issues, schedule, etc. for presentation on
> Wednesday morning. The presentation should last no more than 10 minutes.
>> Comments?
>> **********************************************
> * Don Wright don at lexmark.com *
> * Product Manager, Strategic Alliances *
> * Lexmark International *
> * 740 New Circle Rd *
> * Lexington, Ky 40550 *
> * 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
> **********************************************
>>>