Voting ended March 7.
5 companies voted yes
Zero companies voted no.
The IPP "-actual" attributes specification is formally approved as a PWG
Proposed Standard based on the existing process.
Note that the PWG process is undergoing revision which will likely change
the name of this standard to "Candidate Standard" rather than "Proposed".
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------
----- Forwarded by Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM on 03/12/2003 09:40 PM -----
Harry Lewis
02/14/2003 11:17 AM
To: pwg-announce at pwg.org
cc:
From: Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS
Subject: Formal Approval Voting is OPEN for PWG Proposed
Standard IPP "-actual" attributes
Voting is open for Formal Approval of the PWG Proposed Standard IPP
"-actual" attributes. Last call was completed successfully (see below). I
was trying to wait for the PWG process update before announcing this vote
but I feel the process revision will take longer than anticipated. As the
new process is currently defined, this document would become Candidate
Standard.
Send votes to the ISTO in care of Ami Patel and copy the PWG Chairman,
Harry Lewis. Just a reminder - one vote per company.
a.s.patel at ieee.orgharryl at us.ibm.com
Voting ends at 5pm EST on March 7.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
Chairman - ISTO Printer Working Group
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------
----- Forwarded by Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM on 02/14/2003 11:08 AM -----
Dennis Carney
01/31/2003 04:09 PM
To: Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS
cc:
From: Dennis Carney/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS
Subject: Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Last Call Exit for PWG Proposed
Standard IPP "-actual" attributes
Harry,
I have posted the new version of the "-actual" spec, the one that is ready
to be voted on.
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v04-030131-rev.docftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v04-030131-rev.pdfftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v04-030131.docftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v04-030131.pdfftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-latest.docftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-latest.pdf
So I guess we can start the vote whenever you'd like.
Dennis
Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS
Sent by: owner-pwg-announce at pwg.org
01/30/03 03:32 PM
To: pwg-announce at pwg.org
cc: Dennis Carney/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS
Subject: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Last Call Exit for PWG Proposed
Standard IPP "-actual" attributes
Per the PWG process, LAST CALL for the Printer Working Group Proposed
Standard for Internet Printing Protocol (IPP):"-actual" attributes has
expired today, Jan 30, 2003 at 2200 GMT (5pm in NYC). After incorporating
comments from the last call, a VOTE will determine formal approval for
moving this document to PROPOSED status as currently defined by the PWG
standards track.
You can find the last call versions at
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v03-021216.pdfftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v03-021216.doc
Prior to voting these links will be updated with a revised document that
incorporates the last call comments. These comments, and their resolution
are listed, below. All comments received were editorial in nature.
1. RFC 2565 and 2566 are obsolete. It is not appropriate to reference
obsolete documents, especially as a normative reference. See
Line 146 (in section 1 Introduction)
Line 228 (in section 3 -actual attributes)
Line 331 - 336 (in section 7.1 Normative References
RESOLUTION
- Changed abstract from
"...extension to the Internet Printing Protocol/1.0 (IPP/1.0) [RFC2566,
RFC2565] & IPP/1.1 [RFC2911, RFC2910]..."
to
"...extension to the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) (RFC2911,
RFC2910)...".
- Changed first line of Introduction from
"This document specifies an extension to the Internet Printing
Protocol/1.0 (IPP) [RFC2565, RFC2566] and IPP/1.1 [RFC2910, RFC2911].
to
"This document specifies an extension to the Internet Printing Protocol
(IPP) [RFC2911, RFC2910].
- Added new 3rd paragraph in Introduction:
"This extension is applicable to IPP/1.0 and IPP/1.1, as well as all
future IPP/1.x versions."
- On line 159, changed from:
"In IPP/1.0 and IPP/1.1, it is..."
to
"In IPP, it is..."
- On line 228, changed from:
"...in the IPP Model [RFC2566, RFC2911], ..."
to
"...in the IPP Model [RFC2911], ..."
- Moved references to 2565 and 2566 (lines 331-336) from Normative
References to new Informative References section (section 7.2).
2. In lines 151 & 152 recommend changing "(or are going to print)" to
"(or are expected to be printed)" to be more consistent with the
example in section 3.3.
RESOLUTION
Done
3. In line 239 remove "that has the" and all of the text in the
following line. This additional text adds nothing and results in
a sentence that is very difficult to read.
RESOLUTION
Done
4. In lines 279 and 280 there is a strange split (by WORD) of the
string "-attribute".
RESOLUTION
Fixed
5. The formatting of the document is not per ISTO requirements.
Specifically page numbering and headers. Is there a procedure
for format review prior to final publication? I propose that
this needs to be established.
RESOLUTION
Keeping current formatting for now until new template efforts stabilize.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
Chairman - ISTO Printer Working Group
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/pwg-announce/attachments/20030312/f950165d/attachment-0001.html