PMP> Updated PortMON MIB specification (that includes the res tructured 20050728 mib)

PMP> Updated PortMON MIB specification (that includes the res tructured 20050728 mib)

McDonald, Ira imcdonald at sharplabs.com
Tue Aug 2 12:30:14 EDT 2005


Hi Jerry,

ppmPortDescription was deleted because its content was included
in a ppmPrinterName, ppmPortName, ppmPortProtocolType, etc., as
indicated in my previous note.

I'm probably not going to have any cycles to look at Port MIB
body text until at least this weekend.  I'll do my best.  Others
are welcome to step up and suggest edits (as Jerry did below).

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI  49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com 
-----Original Message-----
From: pmp-owner at pwg.org [mailto:pmp-owner at pwg.org]On Behalf Of
thrasher at lexmark.com
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 2:47 PM
To: pmp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: PMP> Updated PortMON MIB specification (that includes the res
tructured 20050728 mib)



First on the list of name changes that need to be done.... 

Section 8 second bullett:  (ppmPortIEEE1284DeviceID =>
ppmPrinterIEEE1284DeviceID), 
and need to add ppmPrinterName. 

Section 8: 
I'm assuming that the reason that ppmPortDescription is not in the
restructrued MIB is that we no longer needed 
it once we added ppmPrinterName to the already exhisting ppmPortName......??


Jerry 



"McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald at sharplabs.com> 
07/29/2005 12:34 PM 
        
        To:        "'thrasher at lexmark.com'" <thrasher at lexmark.com>,
pmp at pwg.org 
        cc:         
        Subject:        RE: PMP> Updated PortMON MIB specification (that
includes the res        tructured 20050728 mib)



Hi,

About Jerry's comment below

"Please review since with the movement of objects from the Port to
the Printer table, some of the language might not make sense anymore." 

- as I moved each object, I tried to carefully edit the DESCRIPTION and
REFERENCE clauses to convert from single port scope to printer scope 
- but please _do_ think about these descriptions (everywhere in the MIB)
- and please read the new Requirements section carefully

Because we're pretty close to wrapping this document up and going to
Formal Vote for Candidate Standard.

Cheers,
- Ira (co-editor of Printer Port Monitor MIB)

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI  49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: pmp-owner at pwg.org [mailto:pmp-owner at pwg.org]On Behalf Of
thrasher at lexmark.com
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 11:18 AM
To: pmp at pwg.org
Subject: PMP> Updated PortMON MIB specification (that includes the
restructured 20050728 mib)



The changes include the restructuring of the requirements language,
the integration of the latest restructured mib,
hopefully catching all the names that changed from portxxx to printerxxx,
(e.g., portHrDeviceIndex to printerHrDeviceIndex), and updateing the
mib description the best I can.

Posted on the PWG FTP server in the PMP WG directories at:

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/pmp/wd/lcrc-pmpportmib10-20050728.mib

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/pmp/wd/lcrc-pmpportmib10-20050729.doc

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/pmp/wd/lcrc-pmpportmib10-20050729.pdf

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/pmp/wd/lcrc-pmpportmib10-20050729rev.pdf

Summary of changes:

(1) Please see Last Call issues in Appendix C.


Please review since with the movement of objects from the Port to
the Printer table, some of the language might not make sense anymore.

JT 



More information about the Pmp mailing list