Ira,
Will do! Note that this is an error from RFC 1759.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald at sharplabs.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:46 AM
To: 'Steve Tarr'; McDonald, Ira; 'pmp at pwg.org';
'Ron.Bergman at Hitachi-hkis.com'
Subject: RE: IETF printer MIB v2 draft 11
Hi Steve, Thursday (1 February 2002)
[With apologies for the delay in responding...]
Yes, you caught an error in section 2.2.13 "Alerts" of draft-11.
Ron Bergman - please delete the erroneous word "critical" where Steve
has indicated (fourth line on the top of page 16 in draft-11), when we
do the RFC Editor final pass - thanks.
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald (co-editor of Printer MIB v2)
High North Inc
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Steve Tarr [stevet at cesa.opbu.xerox.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:41 PM
> To: imcdonald at sharplabs.com> Subject: IETF printer MIB v2 draft 11
>> Ira,
>> I think I may have discovered a minor error in the introductory text
> for this draft. Section 2.2.13 "Alerts" says, in part "This table
> contains ... description of each critical alert ..." while Section
> 2.2.13.3 "Alert Tables" says "... all active alerts are represented."
> It looks to me like the word "critical" doesn't belong in 2.2.13. Is
> this a correct reading of the draft, or am I missing something?
>> Thanks,
> Steve Tarr
> Xerox OPBU
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------