Ron,
And of course folks from Xerox, including Mike Elvers, and Ira himself
(wearing his still/occasional Xerox hat), have repeatedly said we are
in favor of staying with the original 1759 names (unless there is
compelling reason to change them); changing them causes numerous
development and interoperability difficulties.
/Paul Gloger
---------------------------------------
From: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald at sharplabs.com>
To: "'Ron Bergman'" <rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com>, pmp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: PMP> Reminder of Last Call
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:10:15 -0800
Sender: pmp-owner at pwg.org
Hi Ron,
On 5 January 2000, I stated on this list that Sharp DOES want to
return to the original names in RFC 1759.
I reiterate that statement.
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald (consulting architect at Sharp Labs America)
High North Inc
PS - I object to the broken process that says silence is a NO
vote. IETF procedures are that silence is a YES vote for
IETF chartered working groups.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 5:53 PM
To: pmp at pwg.org
Subject: PMP> Reminder of Last Call
Just a reminder that the last call expires one week from Monday (Jan
24th).
To date there have not been anyone who desires to go back to the names
in RFC 1759. If no objections are received, these names will stay as is
and the subject closed.
Ron Bergman
Hitachi Koki Imaging Solutions