Ira McDonald wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>> I agree that the current I-D breaks SMI, strictly speaking, BUT
> any future I-D MUST be backward compatible with RFC 1759
> 'over-the-wire'. Removing the (redundant) index object from
> the trap binding is NOT backward compatible. It's note
> the IETF's SMI rules that are paramount here. It's the
> PWG's commitment to backward compatible extensions to
> RFC 1759 only in Printer MIB v2.
>> Cheers,
> - Ira McDonald
And now you are making things more difficult for compiler writers
because the mib should not compile.
Mike