Paul,
On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Paul Tykodi <ptykodi at tykodi.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>> Today we have a significant amount of the PWG Schema formatted for compatibility with XMLSpy. I believe this is primarily because it was the tool Pete had available when he was maintaining the schema.
XSD files are compatible between tools.
The question is: "How do we want to visualize the XSD files?", not, "What format do we use?" (for the latter it can be XSD or RelaxNG, but we have been using XSD and I think we should stick with it...)
> Bill brought up as a discussion topic in the recent Semantic Model bi-weekly teleconference the need to choose a tool prior to moving forward with updating the schema diagrams for the SM 2.0 project.
>> It looks like we are lucky he brought up this discussion item at this time.
>> As I have an action item to update the schema diagrams for section 5 (System Configuration) for the draft SM 2.0 document, I’ll try out a few of these tools and see whether any particular tool seems to handle the current PWG Schema format better than others and then report my results to the group
Thanks!
_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20130708/617e1704/attachment-0002.html>