Nancy,
I reworked section 5 a bit to update the section reference and clarify
the container element mapping for your #1 and #2. I updated Table 3 to
remove Raster requirements from the PJT specification. I do not
understand your #3. From my reading the element names in the table are
the same as those in the latest posted Raster spec. I am using
"PWGRasterDocumentBackside" but I don't see "PWGRasterDocumentSheetBack"
anywhere.
Pete
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com <mailto:Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com>
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
From: Nancy.Chen at okidata.com [mailto:Nancy.Chen at okidata.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 6:19 PM
To: Zehler, Peter
Cc: mfd at pwg.org
Subject: Comments on PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities
spec
Hi Pete,
See my comments below -
1) In Section 5 Print Service Description, the section reference for
"the definition for the PrintServiceCapabilities container element" is
incorrect.
See the following text in the spec:
"
368 A container element is needed to carry the subset of
PrintServiceDescription elements,
369 the PrintJobTicketCapabilities and the PrintDocumentCapabilities in
a protocol. Section 0
370 contains the definition for the PrintServiceCapabilities container
element.
"
2) the "container element" mentioned above is not defined in the spec.
3) Table 3 - the element "PWGRasterDocumentBackside" came from PWG
Raster Format spec, in Section 5 Semantic Model Elements - Table 9: the
"PWGRasterDocumentSheetBack" element. Shouldn't this element use the
same name in these two specs????
Regards,
-Nancy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Nancy Chen, PWG Vice-Chair
Principal Engineer
Solutions and Technology
Oki Data
2000 Bishops Gate Blvd.
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
Phone: (856)222-7006
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20120109/bf0382c5/attachment-0002.html>