Hi,
For PIN printing, the destination of the FaxIn must be an electronic
document or a user's electronic mailbox under access control.
As a *separate* job, the end user has to walk up and start
a secure print job. There is no support for *any* DestinationURI
in any PWG MFD service to have a job ticket or other metadata
associated with it.
Fancy printing is NOT the use case of classic fax - just best
effort with the local PrintService's default job ticket is fine.
Real workflow is intentionally out-of-scope in PWG Semantic Model
(at least until SM/3.0 starts up as a project).
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SWG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Christmas through April:
579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:43 PM, William Wagner <wamwagner at comcast.net>wrote:
> I thought that the available job ticket just related to FaxIn processing
> (including the destination). The default job ticket for the destination
> printer would define print processing. I don’t recall that we had available
> job ticket capability for printers (do we?). At any rate, the path for
> communication the PIN code to the printer (and the intended recipient) is
> not clear.****
>> Thanks.****
>> Bill Wagner****
>> ** **
>> *From:* mfd-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:mfd-bounces at pwg.org] *On Behalf Of *Zehler,
> Peter
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2011 2:06 PM
> *To:* Nancy.Chen at okidata.com; Ira McDonald
> *Cc:* mfd at pwg.org; mfd-bounces at pwg.org> *Subject:* RE: [MFD] Why FaxIn should NOT add the PrintService attributes*
> ***
>> ** **
>> This can be accomplished via the AvailableJobTicket, its FaxInMetrics and
> FaxInJobTicket, and a properly configured Printer pointed to by
> DestinationUri. ****
>> ** **
>> ** **
>> Peter Zehler
>> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701 ****
>> ** **
>> *From:* Nancy.Chen at okidata.com [mailto:Nancy.Chen at okidata.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2011 1:33 PM
> *To:* Ira McDonald
> *Cc:* Ira McDonald; mfd at pwg.org; mfd-bounces at pwg.org; Zehler, Peter
> *Subject:* Re: [MFD] Why FaxIn should NOT add the PrintService attributes*
> ***
>> ** **
>>> How can secure retrieval of printed FaxIn document via PIN be supported
> this way? I remember somebody mentioned before in one of our meetings that
> this feature is desired. Just won't be supported?
>> -Nancy
>> ****
>> *Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic at gmail.com>*
> Sent by: mfd-bounces at pwg.org ****
>> 08/10/2011 11:57 AM ****
>> To****
>> "Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com>, Ira McDonald <
>blueroofmusic at gmail.com>, mfd at pwg.org ****
>> cc****
>> Subject****
>> [MFD] Why FaxIn should NOT add the PrintService attributes****
>> ** **
>> ****
>>>> Hi Pete,
>> Originally, we had some boolean to say "and by the way print"
> for FaxIn (and EmailIn, presumably) - no longer in the schema.
>> Then we decided instead to tread print as just another destination.
>> And treating it that way let's the hardcopy for the FaxIn document
> happen easily off-box (e.g., on a printer nearer the user).
>> I strongly favor no extra privilege/details for the print destination of
> FaxIn - just a URI that points to some PrintService that prints with
> the configured defaults.
>> Otherwise FaxIn-to-Print becomes more of a true compound
> service - very undesirable.
>> WDYT?
>> Cheers,
> - Ira
>>> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
> Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SWG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
>http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc> mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com <blueroofmusic at gmail.com>
> Christmas through April:
> 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
> 734-944-0094
> May to Christmas:
> PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
> 906-494-2434
>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>>> _______________________________________________
> mfd mailing list
>mfd at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd ****
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. ****
>>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20110810/4cce7de5/attachment-0001.html>