It was proposed only as a check value - it could be dropped (or use
something like a check sum)
________________________________
From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet at apple.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12 PM
To: Petrie, Glen
Cc: ipp at pwg.org; cloud at pwg.org; mfd at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [IPP] The Proposed PWG Raster
On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Petrie, Glen wrote:
...
Structure and Format of PHRHDR
==========================
...
[96] --- [99] CmpRasterLen
Length in bytes of compressed raster to follow
This kills streaming...
[gwp] Oops, this should do after the raster content to entire
the entire raster was received.
How would that help? And what about raster data larger than 4GiB?
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20110203/11a177ac/attachment-0001.html>