[IPP] Google has reviewed IPP Driver Replacement Extensions v2.0 and has comments

[IPP] Google has reviewed IPP Driver Replacement Extensions v2.0 and has comments

Benjamin Gordon bmgordon at chromium.org
Tue Dec 20 00:13:41 UTC 2022


Sorry about the slow review.  Just a few minor editorial comments:

Section 1:
line 381: depends -> depend for grammatical agreement with "client modules"

Section 5.1:
line 899: It seems like a phrase is missing to explain when the printer
must reject the operation.  Should it include something like "When the
operation is not allowed for a security reason" similar to PWG 5100.13-2012?

Section 6.1.4:
line 1075: implemneting -> implementing

Section 6.2.2.2:
line 1131: Some words seem to be missing before "expand the Impression".
lines 1134/1138: The two figures have the same caption.  Should they
mention "extend" and "scale" to help the reader see which method each
illustrates?

Section 12.1.1:
line 2517: extra "he" in "the he" at the end of the line

Thanks,
Benjamin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20221219/af45078d/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list