[IPP] Google has reviewed IPP Production Printing Extensions v2.0 and has comments

[IPP] Google has reviewed IPP Production Printing Extensions v2.0 and has comments

Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) smith.kennedy at hp.com
Sat Nov 5 01:07:13 UTC 2022


Thanks for the feedback, Benjamin! I appreciate your careful reading.

Cheers,
Smith
---
Smith Kennedy
smith.kennedy at hp.com


On Nov 4, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Benjamin Gordon <bmgordon at chromium.org> wrote:

 CAUTION: External Email
Page 16 step 2 says the printer MUST implement a deprecated attribute
(presentation-direction-number-up). If there's a replacement, should
that be mentioned here and/or 5.2.16? If there's not a replacement
and the printer is required to implement it, is this really
deprecated?

Page 26 line 649: Double period after "ignore the request"

Page 26 5.2.5.2<http://5.2.5.2> and 5.2.5.3<http://5.2.5.3> media and media-col are both listed as
required but are also mutually exclusive. Should they have language
saying "media is CONDITIONALLY REQUIRED if media-col is not supplied"
and vice versa?

Page 27 5.2.6.2<http://5.2.6.2> and 5.2.6.3<http://5.2.6.3> media and media-col are both listed as
required but are also mutually exclusive.

Page 29 5.2.9.3<http://5.2.9.3> and 5.2.9.4<http://5.2.9.4> media and media-col are both listed as
required but are also mutually exclusive.

Page 31 5.2.16 presentation-direction-number-up is deprecated, but
there is no indication of what clients should use instead.

Page 34 5.2.17.2<http://5.2.17.2> and 5.2.17.3<http://5.2.17.3> media and media-col are both listed as
required but are also mutually exclusive.

Thanks,
Benjamin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20221105/f78c863d/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list