Smith,
Works for me as well...
> On Jun 9, 2022, at 10:37 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>> I support changing the 'silicone' keyword defined for "laminating-type" to 'water-resistant'. There is an identical keyword definition for "coating-type" and I support changing that one as well.
>> Cheers
> Smith
>> /**
> Smith Kennedy
> HP Inc.
> */
>>> On Jun 2, 2022, at 1:50 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>>>> Signed PGP part
>> All,
>>>> We had one semi-technical comment for the IPP Finishings 3.0 formal vote concerning the new 'silicone' value for the "laminating-type" member attribute. The commenter suggested changing this to 'water-resistant' in order to better reflect the semantics of the type of lamination as well as making it neutral on which actual material is used to provide water resistance.
>>>> The consensus in today's IPP workgroup conference call was to make this change, however we also wanted to make sure that the previous 'silicone' value has not yet been deployed.
>>>> Please respond (privately, if necessary) to let us know whether you have any objections to replacing the "laminating-type" value 'silicone' with 'water-resistant'. If we don't get an objection before June 10, 2022 then we will assume that publication of IPP Finishings 3.0 can proceed as planned.
>>>> Thank you!
>>>> ________________________
>> Michael Sweet
>>>>>>>
________________________
Michael Sweet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20220610/0e0caa18/attachment.sig>