Smith,
If the products are part of the same series and are being released within a few (4?) months of each other then I have no objection to adding new models based on the original 1.0 self-certification - I know we'd talked about supporting this sort of follow-on amendment for the list of models, not sure if that discussion made it into the self-cert manual...
I wouldn't want this to be abused (i.e. products are released a year apart and ship with wildly different firmware), but we do need to be flexible - just getting approvals in different countries can affect the availability of new products, not to mention all of the usual product roll-out stuff, holidays, pandemics (!), etc.
> On Feb 8, 2021, at 3:35 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>> Signed PGP part
> Greetings,
>> HP Inc. has some products that are or will be certified by the IPP Everywhere Self-Certification v1.0 / v1.1 transition date. But we have some derivatives of those products that won't be released until after the v1.0 / v1.1 transition date. What should the process or policy be for allowing derivatives to be added after the v1.0 / v1.1 transition date? I don't believe we have this documented in PWG 5100.20-2020.
>> Smith
>> /**
> Smith Kennedy
> HP Inc.
> */
>>>
________________________
Michael Sweet