[IPP] Errata resolution draft of IPP Finishings 2.1.1 posted for review

[Michael Sweet]

Smith,

My only nit at the moment is that we only do major.minor numbering for documents.  This should be IPP Finishings 2.2... :)

Thanks!


> On Oct 22, 2020, at 4:17 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> I've posted a draft of IPP Finishings 2.1.1 that resolves the errata currently reported for IPP Finishings 2.1. The draft is here:
> 
> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022.pdf 
> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022.docx 
> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022-rev.pdf 
> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022-rev.docx
> 
> These are the changes:
> 
> Resolved errata reported to PWG website:
> - Issue #56 (https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U56) - Section 11.1 lacks mention of attributes and language clarifying shape / size / rotation of staples and punch
> 
> - Issue #87 (https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U87) - Section 5.1: uses of "feed-orientation" and "orientation-requested" lack source reference citations
> 
> - Issue #88 (https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U88) - Section 5.1.1 says 'RFC 2911 "finishings" Values'
> 
> - Moved the definition of the 'trim-after-pages', 'trim-after-documents', 'trim-after-copies' and 'trim-after-job' enum value here since the originating document [PWG5100.13] is being updated at the time these v2.1.1 errata issues were being resolved.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Smith
> 
> /**
>     Smith Kennedy
>     HP Inc.
> */
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

________________________
Michael Sweet