Chris,
Thanks for your feedback!
> On Feb 13, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Rizzo, Christopher <Christopher.Rizzo at xerox.com> wrote:
>> Just some comments on this. Hope not too late:
>> 1. Line 230: "Use existing the existing IPP" should be "Use the existing IPP"
Thanks, will fix!
> 2. Should section 6.2 include job-account-id and job-accounting-user-id or not because they're in PWG 5100.7 (this spec only defining previously undefined attributes)?
These are defined in 5100.7 so we don't define them here. (had we decided to update TRANS last year, I probably would have moved them to this spec, but we didn't... :)
> 3. Should section 6.4 include job-account-id-supported, job-accounting-user-id-supported, job-account-id-default and job-accounting-user-id-default or not because they're in PWG 5100.7 (this spec only defining previously undefined attributes)?
Ditto.
________________________
Michael Sweet