Thank you Alan for your detailed review and response!
Smith
/**
Smith Kennedy
Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group
HP Inc.
*/
> On Sep 11, 2019, at 8:52 AM, Sukert, Alan <Alan.Sukert at xerox.com> wrote:
>> The following are my comments against IPP System Service v1.0:
> The [ACPI] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document.
> The [DSP1027] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document.
> The [IEEE1284] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document.
> The [IEEE1621] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document.
> The [ISO10175-1] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document.
> The [PWG5100.1] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document. The text does reference [PWG5100.11], so I wonder if the reference in 15.1 is incorrect.
> The [PWG5107.2] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document. Also, the associated link for this reference in 15.1 does not work.
> The [STD66] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document.
> For the [STD92] reference in 15.1, the link may be to the proper document but it doesn’t track with the title in 15.1. 15.1 lists"Internet Printing Protocol/1.1", STD 92, June 2018” but the document the link points to has “Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding and Transport”, is dated January 2017 and is not labeled STD92.
> [ISO10646] is mentioned in Section 12 but is not listed in any of the reference sections in 15.
> [PWG5100.SYS] is mentioned in Section 14 but is not listed in any of the reference sections in 15.
> Not sure this is an issue or not, but I couldn’t reach the link for the [REJUVENATION] reference in 15.2.
> This one is a nit – For the [UNISECFAQ] reference in 15.2, the title in 15.2 says “Unicode Consortium “Unicode Security FAQ”, November2016” but the actual title in the referenced link is “Unicode Consortium “Unicode Security Issues FAQ”, November2016”.
> This may be OK, but in 2.4 on line 517 the https://www.iso.org/standard/18191.html <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/rpp1CADo5oTNqGL5muGUOLZ?domain=iso.org> link takes you to ISO/IEC 10175-1:1996. Is that the document you wanted to point to here?
>> I checked all the references in Section 15 but didn’t check if all the references in the body of the document were listed in Section 15; I will try to do that later if I can get some spare time.
>> Alan Sukert
> Product Security Specialist
> Xerox Research and Development/ Product Security and Development Process Controls
> Xerox Certified Green Belt
>Alan.Sukert at xerox.com| <mailto:Alan.Sukert at xerox.com%7C> tel 585.427.1413
> MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190911/7d4c0958/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190911/7d4c0958/attachment.sig>