Smith,
I do understand the appeal that some vendors have for adding more knobs to differentiate their products, however I can tell you from a client perspective that Apple is extremely unlikely to support arbitrary vendor print quality values since it makes for a bad user experience.
> On Aug 28, 2019, at 4:04 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>> The only problem I see is that vendor- or site-defined print quality values, printer vendors likely want labels that can at least uniquely identify the additional settings, and that could have corresponding _tooltip and _helpurl content.
>> Smith
>> /**
> Smith Kennedy
> HP Inc.
> */
>>> On Aug 28, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>> As an alternative to adding more (out of order) enum values to print-quality, how about a print-quality-percent (integer(0:100)) attribute where:
>>>> - print-quality-percent='25' maps to print-quality='3' (draft),
>> - print-quality-percent='50' maps to print-quality='4' (normal), and
>> - print-quality-percent='75' maps to print-quality='5' (high5)
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> ________________________
>> Michael Sweet
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> ipp mailing list
>>ipp at pwg.org>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>
________________________
Michael Sweet