Hi Mike,
I agree with all your proposed changes.
You didn't propose what to do about it. But for Production Printing Set-1
to be at all useful,
there really *should* be some REQUIRED and RECOMMENDED attributes and a
minimum
of actual OPTIONAL attributes - perhaps w/ some feature grouping?
The rest of IPP Production Printing (e.g., IPP/2.2) builds on this spec -
perhaps building sand
castles?
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:41 PM Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards
Architect) via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>> I support all of these moves. Thanks for your efforts!
>> If others have differing opinions, or have problems with
> obsoleting "current-page-order" or "user-defined-values-supported", please
> speak up!
>> Smith
>> /**
> Smith Kennedy
> Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group
> HP Inc.
> */
>>> On Apr 29, 2019, at 2:23 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>> All,
>> Last year's GSoC projects identified some minor issues with PWG 5100.3:
> IPP Production Printing Attributes. I propose we do an errata update of PWG
> 5100.3 and volunteer to serve as editor. Changes would include:
>> - Remove references to the original page overrides spec (5100.4)
> - Remove/reword a lot of “implementation-defined” content
> - Remove finishings-col - now defined in PWG 5100.1-2017: IPP Finishings
> 2.1
> - Remove new media values (superseded by PWG 5101.1-2012: PWG Media
> Standardized Names v2.0)
> - Obsolete the "current-page-order" Job attribute which gets updated as
> the document data is transformed to reflect the new page order
> - Obsolete the "user-defined-values-supported" Printer attribute as we now
> (properly) use the IANA IPP registry and well-defined extension semantics
> for keyword values
> - More clearly define the "imposition-template" Job Templates, and
> possibly add standard values for watermarking and/or borders
> - Update the document template, add missing sections, and update
> references.
>> Additionally, there are some Job Template attributes (job-account-id,
> job-accounting-user-id, job-sheets-col, and media-col) which are not
> specific to production printing. Since everything in this specification is
> optional (...) it might make sense to move them to the IPP Job Extensions
> v2.0 specification (which is currently in PWG Last Call but could be pulled
> back) so that we can make them required/conditionally required as
> appropriate.
>> Thoughts?
>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp> <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/Aml3Cqx5v5uqZpOEIXBk2_?domain=pwg.org>
>>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190429/58065bf3/attachment.html>