> On Apr 17, 2019, at 5:40 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at msweet.org> wrote:
>> Some quick comments:
>> 1. The tooltip stuff in strings files should be a separate Best Practice. Yes it will be mostly boilerplate... :(
OK. Can reference that from this doc.
>> 2. print-color-mode-default: Drop
I'm interpreting this to mean to remove it from this document, since it is already defined in 5100.13?
>> 3. print-color-mode-supported: Should be print-color-mode
I'm interpreting this to mean just relabel the sub-section to be "print-color-mode"?
FWIW, I've been struggling with a related stylistic concern. If one is defining an attribute, say that specifies a keyword type syntax, and there are standard keywords defined as well, should those standard keyword definitions be made in the "xxx-supported" or "xxx" subsection?
>> 4. print-quality enum extensions: enums are not supposed to use values 1 and 2... :(
Hum - I always puzzled over that. Why is that? Whatever the reason, we need to capture the reason for that in our as-yet-to-be-started IPP Design Patterns document...
> Maybe we could look at a "print-quality-col (collection)" attribute with more details? Or define a separate range (10-19?) representing 10 different vendor-specific qualities?
I'd probably tend toward the latter since that attribute is already widely supported, and I don't know what other fields a "print-quality-col" might provide. Let's see if others have thoughts on that.
>>>>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 2:10 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) via ipp <ipp at pwg.org <mailto:ipp at pwg.org>> wrote:
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> I just posted a first draft of a "IPP Custom Print Quality and Intent Extensions
>> (CUSTOMPQI)" white paper that proposes some additions to IPP that relate to supporting print quality hint and settings additions.
>>>>https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/whitepaper/white-hp-ipp-custompqi-20190412.pdf <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/W969CG6xjxhMD2MKTK84n2?domain=ftp.pwg.org>
>>https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/whitepaper/white-hp-ipp-custompqi-20190412.docx <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/iQcRCJ6AmAhY6gY3hGy9KW?domain=ftp.pwg.org>
>>>> We won't likely have time to review it at our April 2019 F2F in a session, but I encourage those at the F2F to take a look at it so we can discuss after hours, etc. if you have an interest in what it proposes.
>>>> Cheers,
>> Smith
>>>> /**
>> Smith Kennedy
>> HP Inc.
>> */
>>>> _______________________________________________
>> ipp mailing list
>>ipp at pwg.org <mailto:ipp at pwg.org>
>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/CCdKCKrBnBFnXZnzc3PXr6?domain=pwg.org>
>> _____________
> Michael Sweet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190418/183349f6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190418/183349f6/attachment.sig>