Ira,
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:47 PM, Ira McDonald via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> That last may have been a dumb response.
>> But I don't like the term "items". Should we enumerate operations, features,
> attributes, and values?
I originally enumerated things (like we do in the IPP registry process document), which is "operations, attributes, attribute syntaxes, values, and status codes", but that seemed like too much so I opted to shorten things to "items" since it covers any usage.
_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190307/17a810a3/attachment.html>