OK, that makes sense, and that is what I assumed. I got a query from one of my cohorts and wanted to confirm that MSN2 isn't being prescriptive in the sense that it is suggesting that all clients SHOULD use these strings.
Smith
> On Aug 29, 2018, at 2:50 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
>> Smith,
>> It is intended to show suggested text for a user interface, e.g., "US Letter" instead of 'na_letter_8.5x11in'. From an implementor's standpoint it can be used as a starting point for localization, and in fact I use these strings as part of the example ipp.strings file:
>>https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/examples/ipp.strings>>> > On Aug 29, 2018, at 4:44 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Why did we include the "Localized Name" column in Table 3 of PWG 5101.1 MSN2? How is a reader expected to use this information?
> >
> > Smith
> >
> > /**
> > Smith Kennedy
> > Wireless & Standards Architect - IPG-PPS
> > Standards - IEEE ISTO PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum / USB-IF
> > Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group
> > HP Inc.
> > */
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ipp mailing list
> > ipp at pwg.org> > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4241 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20180829/91cf3159/attachment.p7s>