[IPP] Fwd: Protocol Action: Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics to Internet Standard

[IPP] Fwd: Protocol Action: Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics to Internet Standard

Michael Sweet msweet at apple.com
Mon Jun 25 21:23:55 UTC 2018


*Internet Standard*

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary at ietf.org>
> Subject: Protocol Action: Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics to Internet Standard
> Date: June 25, 2018 at 5:15:02 PM EDT
> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce at ietf.org>
> Cc: The IESG <iesg at ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba at computer.org>, draft-sweet-rfc2911bis at ietf.org, draft-sweet-rfc2910bis at ietf.org, barryleiba at computer.org, rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
> Resent-From: alias-bounces at ietf.org
> Resent-To: msweet at apple.com, blueroofmusic at gmail.com
> 
> The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document:
> - Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics
>  (rfc8011) to Internet Standard
> 
> This protocol action is documented at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-change-ipp-to-internet-standard/
> 
> A URL of the affected document is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8011/
> 
> Status Change Details:
> 
> As specified in RFC 6410:
> 
>   (1) There are at least two independent interoperating implementations
>       with widespread deployment and successful operational experience.
> 
>       - Over 98% of all digital network printers shipped in the last
>       decade support IPP/1.1 (originally defined in RFC 2910/2911,
>       September 2000).
> 
>   (2) There are no errata against the specification that would cause a
>       new implementation to fail to interoperate with deployed ones.
> 
>       - There are currently no errata against RFC 8010/8011.
> 
>   (3) There are no unused features in the specification that greatly
>       increase implementation complexity.
> 
>       - There are no unused features in RFC 8010/8011.
> 
>       - The Purge-Jobs operation (from RFC 2911) is DEPRECATED in
>       RFC 8011 (page 73) with "SHOULD NOT support" because it
>       destroys Printer accounting implementation.  This operation
>       has never been widely implemented in digital network printers.
> 
>       - The Restart-Job operation (from RFC 2911) is DEPRECATED in
>       RFC 8011 (page 89) with "SHOULD NOT support" because it
>       destroys Printer accounting implementation.  This operation
>       has never been widely implemented in digital network printers.
> 
>   (4) If the technology required to implement the specification
>       requires patented or otherwise controlled technology, then the
>       set of implementations must demonstrate at least two independent,
>       separate and successful uses of the licensing process.
> 
>       - There is no patented or otherwise controlled technology that
>       is required to implement IPP/1.1 per RFC 8010/8011.
> 
> Personnel
> 
>   Alexey Melnikov is the responsible Area Director.
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20180625/af27e0c3/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list