Hi Paul,
oe = English units
om = Metric units
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Jan-April: 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
May-Dec: PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Paul Tykodi <ptykodi at tykodi.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>> I'm currently not in a location where I can get to the IANA registry to
> look this up myself, what is the difference in meaning between the oe and
> om prefixes in the media names?
>> Thanks.
>> Best Regards,
>> /Paul
> --
> Paul Tykodi
> Principal Consultant
> TCS - Tykodi Consulting Services LLC
>> Tel/Fax: 603-343-1820
> Mobile: 603-866-0712
> E-mail: ptykodi at tykodi.com> WWW: http://www.tykodi.com>> This e-mail reply and any attachments are confidential and may be
> privileged.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Tykodi Consulting
> Services LLC
> immediately by replying to this message and destroying all copies of this
> message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipp <ipp-bounces at pwg.org> On Behalf Of Michael Sweet
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 9:25 AM
> To: Yardumian, Rick <RYardumian at ciis.canon.com>
> Cc: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: Re: [IPP] Canon requests registration of four new IPP media sizes
>> After looking at the existing photo entries, maybe the following would be
> more consistent:
>> oe_square-photo_4x4in
> oe_square-photo_5x5in
> om_square-photo_89x89mm
>> > On Jun 20, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> >
> > Rick,
> >
> >> On Jun 18, 2018, at 7:06 PM, Yardumian, Rick <RYardumian at ciis.canon.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Canon requests that the following four new media sizes be registered.
> >> - om_square_5x5in
> >> - oe_square-4x4_4x4in
> >> - om_square89mm_89x89mm
> >
> > Given these are photo sizes, how about:
> >
> > oe_photo-square_4x4in
> > oe_photo-square_5x5in
> > om_photo-square_89x89mm
> >
> >> - om_cardsize_55x91mm
> >
> > Given this is for business cards, I would suggest:
> >
> > om_business-card_55x91mm
> >
> > I have also seen 55x85mm shown as a standard size of business cards in
> Europe, although that is within 1mm of the credit card size. In North
> America we use 2x3.5in... *If* we added those for completeness we'd have:
> >
> > oe_business-card_2x3.5in (North America)
> > om_business-card_55x85mm (Europe)
> > om_business-card_55x91mm (Japan)
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >> I have checked the IANA IPP registered media sizes and could not find
> any size matches so as far as I can tell, these are new media sizes.
> >>
> >> The first three “square” sizes are used for photographic printing. The
> fourth “cardsize” media is used for business cards. Canon understands that
> the above media names may need to be changed for consistency. All feedback
> is welcome.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Rick Yardumian
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ipp mailing list
> >> ipp at pwg.org> >> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ipp mailing list
> > ipp at pwg.org> > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20180621/28d88dbb/attachment.html>