Hi Till,
Forwarding to the PWG IPP WG list for comment. I'm not sure what the
best practice would be for the IEEE 1284 Device ID CMD field for PWG
Raster.
Mike - suggestions?
Cheers,
- Ira
PS - I'll forward responses back to the Open Printing mailing list.
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:08 AM
Subject: [Printing-architecture] CMD: field of device ID, which entry for
PWG Raster?
To: Open Printing <printing-architecture at lists.linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
the IEEE-1284 device ID has a CMD: field to list the page description
languages (PDLs) which a printer supports. What does it have to contain
according to the standards when the printer supports PWG Raster as input
data format?
Till
_______________________________________________
Printing-architecture mailing list
Printing-architecture at lists.linux-foundation.orghttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/printing-architecture
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20151110/1f855b35/attachment.html>