Hi,
I'm happy with the operation name change.
For more consistent naming with Subscriptions and also between the two
boolean
attributes, I suggest changing "wait-for-document-data (boolean)" to put
the subject
first and therefore "document-data-wait (boolean)", consistent with the
proposed
"document-data-get-interval (integer)".
Cheers,
- ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> Sorry, follow up since I noticed there is also the next-image-get-interval.
>> The amended proposal is as follows (with a slight naming change for #2 for
> consistency):
>> 1. The Get-Next-Document-Images operation will be renamed to
> Get-Next-Document-Data.
>> 2. The "get-next-images-wait-mode (boolean)" operation attribute will be
> renamed to "wait-for-document-data (boolean)".
>> 3. The "next-image-get-interval (integer)" operation attribute will be
> renamed to "document-data-get-interval (integer)".
>>> > On Oct 26, 2014, at 11:53 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > One of the comments during the Formal Vote for IPP Scan Service
> concerned multiple document handling in the scan service and some confusion
> concerning the naming of the Get-Next-Document-Images operation.
> >
> > We would like to change the name of the operation (same operation code)
> to Get-Next-Document-Data for the final publication of the specification.
> >
> > In addition, while making this change I noticed that the operation
> accepts a boolean operation attribute called get-next-images-wait-mode,
> however given that the operation no longer has "images" in the name, the
> value is true/false (true to wait, false to not wait), and the inspiration
> from the ippget operation Get-Notifications is called "notify-wait", I
> would like to change the name of this attribute to "wait-for-data".
> >
> > In summary:
> >
> > 1. The Get-Next-Document-Images operation will be renamed to
> Get-Next-Document-Data.
> >
> > 2. The "get-next-images-wait-mode (boolean)" operation attribute will be
> renamed to "wait-for-data (boolean)".
> >
> > Please let me know if you object to either of these changes. We will
> review these and all other changes for the final draft of the IPP Scan
> Service specification at the November F2F meeting.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
> >
>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20141027/1daf9b0b/attachment.html>