[IPP] JPS3: subscription-uuid vs. notify-subscription-uuid?

[IPP] JPS3: subscription-uuid vs. notify-subscription-uuid?

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Sat Sep 13 15:15:11 UTC 2014


Hi Mike,

I favor the name change.  Consistency in names of similar attributes
is important.

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434


On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> As I finish up my IPPINTRA prototype, I noticed that we (I) defined the
> UUID for subscriptions as "subscription-uuid" instead of
> "notify-subscription-uuid".  The corresponding integer subscription ID is
> "notify-subscription-id", so it would make more sense for us to use
> "notify-subscription-uuid".
>
> I also checked and (for some reason) I never implemented subscription-uuid
> in CUPS...
>
> Any objections to changing the registration to be
> "notify-subscription-uuid"?
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20140913/915d614a/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list