All,
I have completed the updates per the Face to Face review of the edits to address the Last Call comments. We can review the rev version at Monday’s IPP teleconference. As far as I can tell the specification is now ready for formal vote. (You might check the recent OAuth changes to make sure I have it right) I’d like to proceed with formal vote as soon as possible.
I have posted the stable draft at
http://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippscan10-20140901-rev.pdfhttp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippscan10-20140901.pdf
(The docx are also posted)
Last Call Comments are posted at
http://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/IPP-Scan-Comments-20140901.pdf
The two items not completed are:
1) Terminology: separate out protocol role terminology (not needed)
2) Numbered list style: numbers appear to be left of the normal margin instead of indented? (Apparently I have MS Word template issues)
I’m hoping #2 can be addressed in the final cleanup before candidate standard publication.
Thanks,
Pete
Peter Zehler
[parc]
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com<mailto:Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com>
Office: +1 (585) 265-8755
Mobile: +1 (585) 329-9508
FAX: +1 (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
PARC, A Xerox Company
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-27E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20140909/94e7c813/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2783 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20140909/94e7c813/attachment.png>
