[IPP] Xerox has reviewed the IPP Transaction-Based Printing Extensions specification and has comments

[IPP] Xerox has reviewed the IPP Transaction-Based Printing Extensions specification and has comments

Manchala, Daniel Daniel.Manchala at xerox.com
Fri Aug 30 05:27:30 UTC 2013


Xerox has reviewed the IPP Transaction-Based Printing Extensions specification and has the following comments.

Xerox would like to add a new "job-state-reason" to section 8.1 “job-state-reasons (1setOf type2 keyword)”: “incompatible account-information”.  This account (“job-account-id”) is not associated with the user (“job-accounting-user-id”).

Likewise, add a new associated status-code to section 8.2 "client-error-account-information-incompatible" (or something of that nature).

Add an attribute: “job-account-type (type2 keyword | name(MAX))<Job Template>” along with “job-account-type-supported(1setOf type2 keyword | 1setOf name(MAX))<Printer>” and “job-account-type-default(type2 keyword | name(MAX))<Printer>”. The keywords initially can start with ‘none’, ‘general’, ‘group’ or ‘visa-card’, ‘master-card’, ‘paypal’,’bit-coin’, ‘micro-mint’, ‘cash’, ‘credit-account’, etc., . The preference is to use keywords as it aids in the internationalization.

Add the conformance requirement in IPP: Transaction Based Printing, as an addendum to PWG 5100.3-2001 IPP:Production Printing Attributes – Set 1, Section 7 as follows:

If the Printer supports “job-accounting-user-id” then the Printer MUST support “job-account-id”.

If the Printer supports “job-account-id” then the Printer MUST support “job-account-type”

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20130830/b7d2c4d0/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list