Hi Mike,
Agreed - preserving former duplicates as aliases is backward compatible.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> All,
>> Some more investigation with a new automated test suite based on the
> 5101.1 names yielded two more duplicates, these also being present in MSN1:
>> Postfix and ISO C6/C5 (114x229mm)
> PRC10 and ISO C3 (324x458mm)
>> I propose we drop Postfix and PRC10 from the standard self-describing
> names; they can still be aliases for the official names.
>> Thoughts?
>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20130815/82b60cce/attachment.html>