Hi Paul,
The working decision (subject to change) at today's IPP call was
"IPP Transaction-based Printing Extensions" and we agreed to
take the new finishings out and update PWG 5100.1 (similar to
what we did w/ MSN2).
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Paul Tykodi <ptykodi at tykodi.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,****
>> ** **
>> I agree with Glen’s comment that Transactional Printing has a different
> meaning than what we want to convey in this specification. I think that
> “Transaction” will be understood correctly.****
>> ** **
>> Best Regards,****
>> ** **
>> /Paul****
>> --****
>> Paul Tykodi
> Principal Consultant
> TCS - Tykodi Consulting Services LLC
>> Tel/Fax: 603-343-1820
> Mobile: 603-866-0712
> E-mail: ptykodi at tykodi.com> WWW: http://www.tykodi.com****>> *From:* ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] *On Behalf Of *Petrie,
> Glen
> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 12:20 PM
> *To:* Michael Sweet; ipp at pwg.org> *Subject:* RE: [IPP] Updated draft of IPP Transactional Printing
> Extensions (formerly Paid Printing Extensions)****
>> ** **
>> Mike****
>> ** **
>> I was a little surprised at your new title. "Transactional Printing" has
> for a very, very long time meant the "printing of voices, bills,
> statements, notices, checks, letters, etc.". While I have noted that it
> is not uncommon for PWG to "extent" the meaning of terms; might I suggest
> "Transaction" versus Transactional to avoid confusion.****
>> ** **
>> Glen****
>> ** **
>> ** **
> ------------------------------
>> *From:* ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org<ipp-bounces at pwg.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Michael Sweet
> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 8:17 AM
> *To:* ipp at pwg.org> *Subject:* [IPP] Updated draft of IPP Transactional Printing Extensions
> (formerly Paid Printing Extensions)****
>> ** **
>> All,****
>> ** **
>> I have posted an updated stable draft of the IPP Transactional Printing
> Extensions (formerly the IPP Paid Printing Extensions) to:****
>> ** **
>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipptrans10-20130624.docx****>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipptrans10-20130624.pdf****>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipptrans10-20130624-rev.pdf****>> ** **
>> Aside from the name change and some template changes, I've added
> additional terms, explanatory text, and references (including an
> informative reference to CIP4's PrintTalk specification) to hopefully allay
> any confusion and tie everything together cleanly.****
>> ** **
>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair****
>> ** **
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. ****
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. ****
>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20130624/1c831658/attachment-0001.html>