All,
Just noticed that the multiple-operation-timeout-action attribute should have been named multiple-operation-time-out-action since the corresponding RFC 2911 attribute is multiple-operation-time-out. I recommend we update the IPP definition to be multiple-operation-time-out-action.
(note that the SM element is named MultipleOperationTimeout and MultipleOperationTimeoutAction, which doesn't match the normal IPP-to-SM name mapping but at least is internally consistent)
_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.