Thanks Mike for the clarification
________________________________
From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet at apple.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:40 PM
To: Petrie, Glen
Cc: Peter Zehler; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [IPP] media-type names and cotton?
Glen,
"stationery" is just plain sheets of paper. There are qualified versions
of stationery as well, e.g., "stationery-letterhead", so this would just
be another form of that - think special paper used for cover letters or
resumes that otherwise behaves and is used like plain paper.
Technically we could use "fabric" as a top-level media type with
qualified versions for different fabrics and finishes, e.g.:
fabric
fabric-cotton
fabric-glossy
fabric-high-gloss
fabric-inkjet
fabric-linen
fabric-matte
fabric-semi-gloss
fabric-tweed
fabric-waterproof
however I would consider those types to be specific to fabric printing,
e.g. curtains, clothing, etc., and not to sheets of specialized paper.
On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Petrie, Glen wrote:
Mike
Maybe I wrong but I thought stationery was just another word for
"plain"; so this new name means "plain-cotton". Is there anything
wrong with just cotton and linen?
Glen
________________________________
From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf
Of Michael Sweet
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:22 PM
To: Peter Zehler
Cc: <ipp at pwg.org>
Subject: [IPP] media-type names and cotton?
Pete/All,
Do I just need to add "stationery-cotton" to the media type name
list in MSN2?
Do we want this generalized (stationery-fabric?) or list other
materials, e.g., linen?
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is
believed to be clean.
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20120618/7ff2e844/attachment-0001.html>