[IPP] PWG Raster Format Last Call Comments and Draft Posted

[Michael Sweet]

Whoops, thanks Bill!

On Mar 7, 2012, at 7:09 PM, William Wagner wrote:

> I suggest
> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20120307.pdf or
> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20120307-rev.pdf and
> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/lcrc-ippraster10.txt
> might work better.
> Bill W.
>  
> From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Michael Sweet
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 6:58 PM
> To: ipp at pwg.org
> Subject: [IPP] PWG Raster Format Last Call Comments and Draft Posted
>  
> All,
>  
> I have posted an updated draft of the PWG Raster Format specification and the last call comments to:
>  
>             ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20120307-rev.pdf
>             ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/ipp/wd/lcrc-ippraster10.txt
>  
> For review and discussion at Monday's IPP concall...
>  
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>  
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean.

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20120308/07293f9a/attachment-0001.html>