Dave Whitehead wrote:
> I think option 1 may be the way to proceed (if that's what we want to do!)
> since it would then be just another document we reference in the IPPv2x
> document.
But won't option 1 (write a new standard, reference it in IPP/2.x)
still require prototyping, etc?
Plus, I don't see how we are getting around the prototype requirements
for 2.x - we *are* adding new content WRT version numbers, and that
requires prototyping to do any kind of testing/validation between
implementations.
--
______________________________________________________________________
Michael R Sweet Senior Printing System Engineer