Ron.Bergman at ricoh-usa.com wrote:
> There is no need to provide a 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 conformance. We have already
> agreed on the conformance of the containing specifications.
> See:
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/ippv2-docs/ippv2-cups-proposal-2008-02-25.pdf>> This effort is attempting to determine which operations within these
> docments are to be mandatory.
and that is likely to depend on the conformance levels. A network
printer doesn't need to support hold/release job operations, but a
workgroup print server *does*.
--
______________________________________________________________________
Michael R Sweet Senior Printing System Engineer