IPP> IPPv2 Statement Of Work Update

IPP> IPPv2 Statement Of Work Update

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Tue Mar 4 22:42:24 EST 2008


Hi Tom,

My two cents - these profiles (i.e., version 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, etc.) should ONLY
make whole IPP standards specs (IETF or PWG) mandatory, conditionally
mandatory, or optional.

Although there has been speculation that individual operations (but NOT
attributes) might be raised in requirements level from their original specs,
I'm opposed to doing so.

The sole function of the IPP/2.x effort should be simply to encourage more
widespread implementation of the many IPP extensions (a set of content
much larger than the entire original IPP/1.1 protocol).  And to simplify the
description of such higher implementation functionality for end users.

Changing specific requirements levels *within* particular IPP specs is a
slippery slope that would destroy the IPP/2.x effort (and violate the PWG
Process/2.0 rules).

Bear in mind that the PWG Process/2.0 is much more rigorous than past
PWG practice.  Actual prototypes are REQUIRED before a document can
even enter PWG Last Call, much less be adopted.  It remains to be seen
if this can be achieved for IPP/2.x.

Cheers,
- Ira

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Hastings, Tom N <Tom.Hastings at xerox.com> wrote:
> The statement of work says:
>
>  *  OBJ-1 Include a reference to all IPP Standards Track documents,
>  starting from version 1.1.
>  *  OBJ-2 All current IPP features are to be included as a requirement or
>  an option.
>  *  OBJ-3 All features are to be classified as Mandatory, Conditionally
>  Mandatory, or Optional.
>
>  What is a "feature"?  What is the level of granularity of a feature?  An
>  operation, an object, an attribute, or an attribute value?
>
>  In other words, at what level of detail will the "Mandatory",
>  "Conditionally Mandatory" or "Optional" be specified at: an operation,
>  an object, an attribute, or an attribute value?
>
>  The PWG Semantic model lists all of the operations, objects, attributes,
>  and values (though spelled "funny"), along with the documents in which
>  they are defined, if that is a help is compiling a profile template.
>
>  Tom
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: owner-ipp at pwg.org [mailto:owner-ipp at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
>  Ron.Bergman at ricoh-usa.com
>  Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 09:56
>  To: ipp at pwg.org
>  Subject: IPP> IPPv2 Statement Of Work Update
>
>
>  The IPPv2 Charter has been converted into a Statement of Work.
>
>  Send any comments to the mail list.
>
>
>  ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/ippv2-docs/wd-ippv2-statement-of-work-2008
>  0221.pdf
>   (.doc)
>
>
>
>



-- 
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
email: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
winter:
  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176
  734-944-0094
summer:
  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
  906-494-2434



More information about the Ipp mailing list