Appreciate it. Don't mean to trigger an avalanche. I figure your eyes are
exposed to more drafts addressing like requirements than mine. If my
assumption is incorrect, disregard my request.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
http://www.pwg.org
IBM Printing Systems
http://www.ibm.com/printers
303-924-5337
----------------------------------------------
"Scott Hollenbeck" <sah at 428cobrajet.net>
04/07/2004 07:20 PM
To
Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS
cc
<carl at manros.com>, Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS,
<hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>, <ipp at pwg.org>
Subject
RE: draft-ietf-ipp-ops-set2-03
Harry,
> I agree that it is essential to discuss security requirements
> for admin ops. There must be other projects, drafts etc who
> have encountered similar requirements. It might help (speed
> things up) if you could point me to a reference which you
> feel would align with our admin security requirements in
> terms of scope and approach.
I'll try. I'll see if I can find something by searching the RFC editor's
archives and maybe get some help from a security guy who knows something
about applications.
-Scott-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/ipp/attachments/20040407/41a4872a/attachment-0001.html