Dennis,
Attached is a diagram showing how the "-actual" objects could be structured.
It puts the "ProcessingActual" elements in the Job. The "ProcessingActual"
contains "JobProcessingActual" and a multivalued "DocumentProcessingActual".
"ProcessingActual" identifies its Printer and Job. Since there can be
multiple Documents, the "DocumentProcessingActual" identifies its associated
Document.
Since the Job is the active entity is it appropriate to carry the Job
"Receipt"(i.e. "-actual") information there?
Pete
Peter Zehler
XEROX
Xerox Architecture Center
Email: PZehler at crt.xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-8871
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-30E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Carney [mailto:dcarney at us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Zehler, Peter
Subject: Re: IPP> RE: "-actual" containment issue
Peter,
Sounds good.
Dennis
"Zehler, Peter"
<PZehler at crt.xero To: "Zehler, Peter"
<PZehler at crt.xerox.com>, Dennis Carney/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS, "'ipp at pwg.org'"
x.com> <ipp at pwg.org>,
"'sm at pwg.org'" <sm at pwg.org>
Sent by: cc:
owner-ipp at pwg.org Subject: IPP> RE: "-actual"
containment issue
10/24/02 09:02 AM
Dennis,
I believe that new groups should be created for "-actual" just as there are
groups for "supported" and "default". The "DocumentProcessingActual" group
should exist in both the Job and Document. The "JobProcessingActual"
should
exist only in the Job. This would parallel the processing elements nicely.
Pete
Peter Zehler
XEROX
Xerox Architecture Center
Email:
PZehler at crt.xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-8871
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox
Corp.
800
Phillips Rd.
M/S
128-30E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: job-actual.png
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6177 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.pwg.org/archives/ipp/attachments/20021025/55be33b7/job-actual-0001.obj