In case you weren't aware, there is an RFC Errata procedure. See
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html
which you can get to from the RFC Editor's Home Page at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org
Scanning a number of the errata seems to show the same kinds of errata about
allocation of ranges of codes as the errata we have in RFC 2911.
This is the first errata for RFC 2911.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 17:52
To: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
Cc: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: IPP> Errata in RFC 2911: "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model
and Se mantics"
This note points out two errata in RFC 2911 regarding the ranges of status
codes.
Section 13, which is "APPENDIX B: Status Codes and Suggested Status Code
Messages" has:
"redirection" - 0x0200 to 0x02FF
which should be:
"redirection" - 0x0300 to 0x03FF
and has:
The top half (128 values) of each range (0x0n40 to 0x0nFF, for n = 0
to 5) is reserved for vendor use within each status code class.
which should be:
The top half (128 values) of each range (0x0n80 to 0x0nFF, for n = 0
to 5) is reserved for vendor use within each status code class.
Thank you,
Tom Hastings
IPP WG Editor