Done!
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:23 PM
To: Michael Sweet; Hastings, Tom N
Cc: Bergman, Ron; ipp (E-mail); IMAGING at forum.upnp.org
Subject: RE: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for
Medi a Std
Yes, lets get rid of coating for the 'stationery-inkjet' media type. That
is just one way.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Sweet [mailto:mike at easysw.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 14:07
To: Hastings, Tom N
Cc: Bergman, Ron; ipp (E-mail); IMAGING at forum.upnp.org
Subject: Re: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for
Media Std
"Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
> ...
> stationery-inkjet
> Separately cut sheets of an opaque material whose coating [on both sides]
> is designed to minimize the spread of liquid inks
Many inkjet papers don't have a coating at all, right? I hate to
quibble, but how about:
stationery-inkjet
Separately cut sheets of an opaque material that can be printed on
both sides and is designed to minimize the spread of liquid inks
^^^^ could also be "coated"
This makes it truly generic with regards to coating - the glossy and
matte types can be used to specify a particular finish.
--
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw.com
Printing Software for UNIX http://www.easysw.com