Tom,
I agree with Michael's position on this. I don't believe there is
any advantage in defining single or two sided.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Sweet [mailto:mike at easysw.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 7:14 AM
To: Hastings, Tom N
Cc: ipp at pwg.org; IMAGING at forum.upnp.org; GRANT,MELINDA
(HP-Vancouver,ex1); Mark VanderWiele (E-mail)
Subject: Re: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for
Media Std
"Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
>> But leave in the two-sided for the stationery-coated, stationery-
> glossy, and stationery-matte, correct?
For the purposes of defining the media type, it's probably best to
keep both photo and stationary media ambigious (e.g. "may or may not
be coated on both sides") than to say something specific. These are
already generalized names anyways, and in actual use (media-col, etc.)
we have the means of identifying more specific requirements.
--
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw.com
Printing Software for UNIX http://www.easysw.com