Here are my comments and suggestions for V0.6:
1) Line 135, add to the end of the definition: "This name is provided for
historical context."
2) Section 3.1: Add one or two examples.
3) Section 4.1: Add one or two examples.
4) Section 5.1.1: The first 2 sentences of this section are highly redundant.
Suggest combining them into one sentence.
5) Section 6.1: Add one or two examples.
Overall... looks good!
**********************************************
* Don Wright don at lexmark.com *
* Chair, Printer Working Group *
* Chair, IEEE MSC *
* *
* Director, Alliances & Standards *
* Lexmark International *
* 740 New Circle Rd *
* Lexington, Ky 40550 *
* 859-825-4808 (phone) 603-963-8352 (fax) *
**********************************************
"Bergman, Ron" <Ron.Bergman%HITACHI-HKIS.COM at interlock.lexmark.com> on
04/09/2001 11:01:22 AM
Please respond to "Bergman, Ron"
<Ron.Bergman%HITACHI-HKIS.COM at interlock.lexmark.com>
To: IMAGING%FORUM.UPNP.ORG at interlock.lexmark.com
cc: (bcc: Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: Media Standardized Names, Version D0.6 is now available
All,
The latest draft is now available at:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/media-sizes/pwg-media-06.pdf (or .doc)
I will not repeat the abstract here or the list of changes. This
information is
available within the document, if you are interested. The major change to
this
version is the addition of the "Media Finish Names".
This document will have a final review in the PWG meetings during the week
of April 23rd and should then be ready for last call.
Ron Bergman
Hitachi Koki Imaging Solutions