Ron, et al:
We don't need to wait until last call to assign a number.
Cindy:
Could you assign 5100.5 to this project: "Media Standardized Names"?
**********************************************
* Don Wright don at lexmark.com *
* Chair, Printer Working Group *
* Chair, IEEE MSC *
* *
* Director, Strategic & Technical Alliances *
* Lexmark International *
* 740 New Circle Rd *
* Lexington, Ky 40550 *
* 859-232-4808 (phone) 859-232-6740 (fax) *
**********************************************
RonBergman%aol.com at interlock.lexmark.com on 03/30/2001 08:58:29 PM
To: ipp%pwg.org at interlock.lexmark.com, upd%pwg.org at interlock.lexmark.com
cc: (bcc: Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: Fwd: RE: IPP> RE: PWG> Media Names Standard, Version D0.5 Available
Return-Path: <Ron.Bergman at Hitachi-hkis.com>
Received: from rly-zc03.mx.aol.com (rly-zc03.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.3]) by
air-zc03.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:49:48 -0500
Received: from triton.hitachi-hkis.com (mailport.dpc.com [192.101.159.107]) by
rly-zc03.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:49:17 -0500
Received: by triton.hitachi-hkis.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <HZ6RMDHW>; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:53:12 -0800
Message-ID: <3BC1BD0C7E6DD411A13200508BDCC83D27BE70 at triton.hitachi-hkis.com>
From: "Bergman, Ron" <Ron.Bergman at Hitachi-hkis.com>
To: "'Hastings, Tom N'" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>, "Bergman, Ron"
<Ron.Bergman at Hitachi-hkis.com>, RonBergman at aol.com
Cc: pwg at pwg.org, ipp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP> RE: PWG> Media Names Standard, Version D0.5 Available
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:53:03 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks Tom!
I believe I have all the other changes included and I plan to do a
final check this weekend. So I'll hold off until these arrive so
we can have a close to final draft next week.
Regarding an ISTO-PWG assigned number, Don told me we have to wait
until Working Group last call before it can be assigned. If we
start the last call next week the earliest we would have a number
is May 2nd. Why again must the UpNP have a number before the next
meeting?
Ron
Here is the response from Don.
>>>> Ron:
>>>> We can assign this a number any time but....
>>>> 1) Since this is an output of the IPP working group, it needs a 2 week
working
>> group last call, then...
>>>> 2) A PWG membership vote (another 2 weeks)
>>>> 3) Then it will be posted to the PWG standards page probably as
>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/standards/pwg5100.5.pdf>>>> **********************************************
>> * Don Wright don at lexmark.com *
>> * Chair, Printer Working Group *
>> * Chair, IEEE MSC *
-----Original Message-----
From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:06 PM
To: Bergman, Ron; Hastings, Tom N; RonBergman at aol.com
Cc: pwg at pwg.org; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP> RE: PWG> Media Names Standard, Version D0.5 Available
I just ordered a copy from the ASME. It should be here next Tuesday.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Bergman, Ron [mailto:Ron.Bergman at Hitachi-hkis.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 07:38
To: 'Hastings, Tom N'; RonBergman at aol.com
Cc: pwg at pwg.org; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP> RE: PWG> Media Names Standard, Version D0.5 Available
Tom,
I do not have access to ASME-Y14.1M, so I am unable to do this
research. Do you have a copy?
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:14 PM
To: RonBergman at aol.com
Cc: pwg at pwg.org; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: IPP> RE: PWG> Media Names Standard, Version D0.5 Available
IPP (RFC2911) has a number of media names that include engineering sizes
taken from [ASME-Y14.1M]. For some reason we only included them as media
names (e.g., iso-a1x3-transparent), and not as media size names (e.g.,
iso-a1x3) in IPP. These size names are:
iso-a1x3, iso-a1x4
iso-a2x3, iso-a2x4, iso-a2x5
iso-a3x3, iso-a3x4, iso-a3x5, iso-a3x6, iso-a3x7
iso-a4x3, iso-a4x4, iso-a4x5, iso-a4x6, iso-a4x7, iso-a4x8, iso-a4x9
Should we add them?
Someone should look at [ASME-Y14.1M] and get the proper length dimensions
(which aren't in IPP), to go with the width dimensions which are in IPP.
Thanks,
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: RonBergman at aol.com [mailto:RonBergman at aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:48
To: pwg at pwg.org; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: PWG> Media Names Standard, Version D0.5 Available
The latest version is now available at:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/media-sizes/pwg-media-05.pdf
The major change is the merging of the envelope sizes
with the other tables and the separation of the media
type with the size. In addition I have added the
definition of a format for custom media types and color
per a request from Norbert.
There are still two open issues that I am waiting for
clarification from Tom.
1. Tom added a reference [REG] in section 3, but no
corresponding entry in the References section.
2. The ABNF for the size name in section 5.1 may be
incorrect. I am not an ABNF expert, but I believe that
| "-" | "-" ) should be simply | "-" )
I will try to attend the IPP teleconference tomorrow
to discuss any other issues concerning this document.
Ron Bergman
Hitachi Koki Imaging Solutions