Ned,
In response, I think you will find that our more recent documents have
become shorter (but instead more of them).
I think you failed to reveal to us that doing the drafts in NROFF could have
cut the IESG/RFC Editor process with some 12 months or so...
Carl-Uno
Carl-Uno Manros
Manager, Print Services
Xerox Architecture Center - Xerox Corporation
701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
Email: manros at cp10.es.xerox.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ned.freed at mrochek.com [mailto:ned.freed at mrochek.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 2:03 PM
To: McDonald, Ira
Cc: 'ipp at pwg.org'
Subject: Re: IPP> RFC 3080/3081 - BEEP (Blocks Extensible Exchange
Protocol)
> So the BEEP stuff is now IETF Proposed Std RFC 3080/3081.
> Amazing how quickly things can move in the RFC Editor's queue.
I've found that things move a lot quicker when (1) You provide NROFF source
to
the RFC editor and (2) The documents are relatively short and use relatively
simple typographical conventions. I believe the BEEP documents met all of
these criteria.
I pointed this out to the IPP WG at one point but was told that this wasn't
an
option for IPP documents.
Ned