When we go over typos with the RFC Editor, I'll change the syntax for
"number-up-supported" from:
(1setOf integer(1:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(1:MAX))
to:
1setOf (integer(1:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(1:MAX))
Tom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herriot, Robert
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 18:10
> To: Johnson, Swen R; Herriot, Robert
> Cc: XAC.JavaPrintAPI.Core; Hastings, Tom
> Subject: RE: Syntax for number-up-supported ?
>>> Solution #1 is the correct answer. The idea is that a printer might
> support "1:4,8" which is equivalent to "1,2,3,4,8"
>> Tom: you might want to fix this in the model document.
>> Bob Herriot
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Swen R
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 5:11 PM
> To: Herriot, Robert
> Cc: XAC.JavaPrintAPI.Core
> Subject: Syntax for number-up-supported ?
>> Bob,
>> The IPP Model gives the syntax for number-up-supported as:
>> (1setOf integer(1:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(1:MAX))
>> This seems ambiguous (the outer parentheses don't help). Should this
> be interpreted as:
>> 1setOf (integer(1:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(1:MAX))
>> or as:
>> (1setOf integer(1:MAX)) | rangeOfInteger(1:MAX)
>>> Thanks,
>> -- Swen
>>