Tom,
We will look at Hugo's paper, after all this is just a first draft.
Happy?
Carl-Uno
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 10:53 AM
> To: don at lexmark.com> Cc: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - 14 documents for IPP WG meeting, 9/22-23/99 in
> Den ver
>>> Don,
>> I agree that our PWG process intent was that the one week
> recommendation was
> for all documents, not just white papers. That is something
> we should fix
> in our process document.
>> But my other point was that the group could and should still
> consider Hugo's
> really good paper if there wasn't serious objection from any one to
> considering it. It is my opinion that he should be able to
> present the
> paper. We're not going to vote on his paper at this meeting,
> but his paper
> is really important for the success of IPP notification.
>> Same for Harry's Set 2 paper, though that is really an
> updated paper from
> previous meetings with previous meeting and email agreements
> rolled in.
>> Tom
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: don at lexmark.com [mailto:don at lexmark.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 20:53
> To: hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com> Cc: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - 14 documents for IPP WG meeting, 9/22-23/99 in
> Denver
>>> While I agree a strict interpretation of this would be it
> only applies to
> white
> papers but I believe the intent of the discussion around this
> point was that
> is
> applied to all documents especially something completely new
> like Hugo's
> paper.
>> **********************************************
> * Don Wright don at lexmark.com *
> * Director, Strategic & Technical Alliances *
> * Lexmark International *
> * 740 New Circle Rd *
> * Lexington, Ky 40550 *
> * 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
> **********************************************
>>>>>> hastings%cp10.es.xerox.com at interlock.lexmark.com on 09/21/99
> 05:09:06 PM
>> To: Don Wright at LEXMARK> cc: ipp%pwg.org at interlock.lexmark.com> Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - 14 documents for IPP WG meeting,
> 9/22-23/99 in Den
> ver
>>>>> Don,
>> Possibly the omission of the one week rule is a bug in our PWG process
> document. I could only find the one week rule mentioned in
> the section 4.1
> on PWG White Papers:
>> It is strongly recommended that no item be opened for
> discussion on the
> agenda of a
> PWG meeting without first having been documented in a
> white paper which
> has been made
> available for review at least one week prior to the
> meeting where the
> paper is to
> be discussed.
>> Also in other standards bodies with a one week rule, the rule
> is that a
> paper made available less than a week before the meeting is
> not considered
> if there are objections to considering it, rather than an out
> and out ban on
> considering such a paper.
>> I would hope that the group would consider Hugo's and Harry's
> contributions.
>> I'm certainly in favor of getting papers out a week ahead of
> time so that
> people can read them ahead of the meeting.
>> Tom
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: don at lexmark.com [mailto:don at lexmark.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 12:29
> To: hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com> Cc: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: Re: IPP> ADM - 14 documents for IPP WG meeting, 9/22-23/99 in
> Denver
>>> Of course any document posted after 9/14 DOES NOT meet the
> one week deadline
> for
> discussion.
>> **********************************************
> * Don Wright don at lexmark.com *
> * Director, Strategic & Technical Alliances *
> * Lexmark International *
> * 740 New Circle Rd *
> * Lexington, Ky 40550 *
> * 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
> **********************************************
>>>>>> hastings%cp10.es.xerox.com at interlock.lexmark.com on 09/21/99
> 01:43:36 PM
>> To: ipp%pwg.org at interlock.lexmark.com> cc: (bcc: Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark)
> Subject: IPP> ADM - 14 documents for IPP WG meeting,
> 9/22-23/99 in Denver
>>>>> Here are the list of 14 documents for the IPP WG Meeting,
> 9/22/99 - 9/23/99
> in Denver that Carl-Uno and I have collected for the agenda.
> There are
> quite a few documents this time. Most of them have been seen
> before. Some
> are important mail messages previously sent. I've copied
> this agenda file
> into:
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/agendas/Documents-for-ipp-meetin> g-990922.pdf
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/agendas/Documents-for-ipp-meetin> g-990922.doc
>> Carl-Uno, Harry, and Hugo are bringing copies of their
> documents. The URLs
> are also indicated below:
>> Documents for the IPP WG meeting, September 22-23, 1999 Denver
>> IPP/1.1 Model and Semantics:
> 1. RE: IPP> MOD> printer-state-reasons [please put this on
> the IPP W G
> meeting agenda], September 20, 1999, Hastings
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/proposed-clarifications/printer-> state-reasons-
> issue.pdf
> 2. Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: "finishings" attribute values
> extension, September 21, 1999, Manros, Hastings, Fullman
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/proposed-registrations/attribute-values/ipp-fi
nishings-attr-vals-990921-rev.pdf
3. Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: "media" attribute values extension,
September 21, 1999, Manros, Hastings, Fullman
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/proposed-registrations/attribute-values/ipp-me
dia-attr-vals-990921-rev.pdf
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/proposed-registrations/attribute-values/ipp-me
dia-attr-vals-990921-examples-1-2.pdf
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/proposed-registrations/attribute-values/ipp-me
dia-attr-vals-990921-examples-3-4.pdf
4. Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Implementer's Guide, September 14,
1999, Hastings, Manros, Kugler, Holst
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_IIG/ipp-implementers-guide-990914.pdf
Notification:
5. Internet Printing Protocol/1.0 & 1.1: IPP Event Notification
Specification - Alternative, September 10, 1999, Isaacson, Martin, deBry,
Hastings, Shepherd, Bergman
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_NOT/ipp-not-spec-alt-990910.pdf
6. IPP> NOT - Proposed alternative to make Per-Job like Per-Printer
subscriptions, September 13, 1999, Hastings [explains document 5]
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_NOT/ipp-not-compare-alt.pdf
7. IPP> NOT - UPDATED 15 Notification Issues for IPP WG Meeting,
September 20, 1999, Hastings [issues in document 5]
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_NOT/ipp-not-15-issues-990920.pdf
8. Definition of Managed Objects for IPP Servers using SMIv2
<draft-ietf-ipp-server-mib-00.txt>, September 19, 1999, McDonald, Hastings
[SNMP/UDP transport method for IPP notification delivery]
ftp://ftp.pwg.org//pub/pwg/ipp/new_MIB/draft-ietf-ipp-server-mib-00.pdf
9. Internet Printing Protocol: HTTP-Based IPP Notification Protocol,
September 20, 1999, Parra [HTTP transport method for IPP notification
delivery]
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_NOT/ipp-ntfy-http-protocol.pdf
10. Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: attribute syntax for Collection,
September 9, 1999, deBry, Hastings, Herriot [new 'collection' attribute
syntax used by Notification]
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_COL/ipp-collection-attr-syntax-990909.pdf
11. IPP/1.0 and IPP/1.1: Job Progress Attributes, September 13, 1999,
Hastings, Lewis, Bergman [definition of job progress attributes used by
'job-progress' event in Notification]
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_NOT/ipp-job-prog-attr-990913.pdf
Set 2 Operations:
12. Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Optional Operations -
Requirements, August 31, 1999, Lewis
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/proposed-registrations/operations/ipp-ext-req-
990831.PDF
Internet Printing Protocol/1.0 & 1.1: Set2 Operations, September 19, 1999,
Lewis, Kugler, Hastings
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/proposed-registrations/operations/ipp-ops-set2
-990919.PDF